Thursday, November 29, 2007

Brody hurt; Chiefs sign old man

Brody Croyle is suffering from a sore back and may sit out of the San Diego game this Sunday, thus giving Huard another brief opportunity to start. This confirms one of my other major criticisms of Croyle, besides his poor decision making, which is that he doesn’t look durable enough to be an NFL quarterback. I’m not questioning his toughness. Anyone who can play nearly an entire college season with a separated left shoulder is tough. So is the fact that he finished last Sunday’s game against Oakland after taking the injuring hit on only the second offensive play of the game when he ran away from pursuit due to no open receivers. This sort of pressure will certainly continue this season with a patchwork offensive line that still struggles to create running lanes for our backs and protection for our passers. It could be Huard’s 34-year-old frame receiving the punishment from the likes of Shawne “Priest Killer” Merriman and Shuan Phillips. Imagine this headline: “Priest revered by entire city killed by homicidal Steroid Freak.” It happened…and it killed his NFL career, notwithstanding his brief flirtation with the league this season.
It’s nice to see that the Chiefs are gushing over this season’s third field goal kicker, NFL journeyman John Carney.
“But for now, we submit this scene for believe-it-or-not: the Chiefs cheering their kicker.
Yep. Happened around noon on Wednesday in their indoor practice facility, as new man John Carney was perfect on his first four kicks: from 30, 35, 38 and 40 yards.” { “Chiefs Cheer new kicker Carney” by Sam Melliinger in the Nov. 29 KC Star}
I presume Carney’s fifth attempt was beyond 40 yards and missed. Melllinger goes on to write that the longest field goal he made while filling in for Josh Scobee in Jacksonville this season was 41 yards. And we will lose field position compared to the Rayner days because of Carney’s poor range on kickoffs.
This just serves to highlight the huge whiff the Chiefs had drafting Justin Medlock instead of Packer rookie Mason Crosby. Medlock is now a basketcase sitting at home in his Southern California home wondering what could have been. Crosby on the other hand is tied for second in the NFL with 22 field goals made, although his field goal percentage is an unimpressive 26th at 79%. He is tied with Tennessee’s Rob Bironas for the most field goals attempted by a kicker this season. Crosby is 8 for 9 when kicking a 30-39 yard field goal, an improvement over Rayner’s 7 for 10. Crosby also sank a 53-yard field goal while Rayner missed his only attempt over 50 yards. Crosby has missed the bulk of his field goals in the 40-49 range, going 5-9 while Rayner is a hair better, making five out of eight attempts.
Crosby gets all the attention in KC because he was a Big 12 prospect, but the Chiefs could have also drafted the Dallas Cowboy’s Nick Folk, who along with Crosby went in the sixth round. Folk is sitting in the middle of the pack in field goal percentage at 15 with an 85%. An important note on that percentage, two of his three total misses were from beyond 50 yards.

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Herm Edwards' Apologists

I was going to write this entry about the Chiefs' deplorable offense and how Herm Edwards and his coaching staff are to blame for its lack of productivity. Then I read Adam Teicher's "Chiefs' Solari takes some blame for struggles" article and learned that it's mostly the players' fault. "Our responsibility is to put them in position to make the plays. When they're called up, they've got to make the plays," Solari was quoted in Teicher's article.
Here's what I saw when I attended the Oakland Raiders loss at Arrowhead on Sunday: I saw one unimaginative series of play-calling after another. Faced with a first and 20, I saw the Chiefs run three straight draw plays. I saw the coaching staff waste two timeouts that could have been used to stop the clock during the Raiders' last drive and give the Chiefs another opportunity on offense to score. I saw them run a predictable 4th-and-1 dive play up the middle late in the fourth quarter with nine Raiders stacked in the box.
Its losses like these and the play-calls that cause them that turn fans against their coach. It's not news that Chiefs fans have been calling for Peterson's job since Schottenheimer parted ways with the franchise, but now a frenzy is growing around Herm Edwards and his future with the team. I know… blaming the coach is just fodder for sports call-in shows and drunken redneck debate, but sentiment spreads quickly in professional sports, especially considering how much emotional and psychic energy Chiefs' fans have tied up in their team. But the anti-Herm and anti-Carl rhetoric abounds on the comment boards and over the airwaves, so I thought I would address the silent authority… the Herm apologists. But I will do so by countering popular criticisms heaped upon Herm since he took over the New York Jets in 2001.
A popular Kansas City criticism of Herm Edwards is that he ruined the best offense in the league. Apologist have countered that the writing was on the wall. We had two Hall of Fame offensive linemen retire with no suitable backups waiting in the wings and an aging number one receiver with yet again no suitable backups in the stable. Apologists contend that the failure of the team is circumstantial rather than any particular coaching decision is on Herm’s part. In New York, Herm’s early success and three playoff opinions were often credited more to the strong veteran lineup Parcells left in tact when he left the organization. In fact, according to Wikipedia, the lack of player development was given as one of the reasons the New York Jets suffered a 4-12 hemorrhage after going to the playoffs the year before.
Apologists have countered that the writing was on the wall in Kansas City following the departure of Vermeil. We had two Hall of Fame offensive linemen retire and no suitable backups to take their places and an aging number one receiver with yet again no suitable backups waiting in the wings. The same apologists contend that the failure of the team is circumstantial rather than any particular coaching decision on Herm’s part.
I wouldn’t label Joe Posnanski an out-and-out Herm apologist, but he certainly blames the losses and poor offensive play this season on “a bad team.”
Posnanski: “And I think Edwards is just the right coach to build from scratch. He may drive people nuts with his defensive mindset and game planning, but the guy has a special talent for finding good young players and developing them, which is more important. All year, Edwards kept telling us that rookie running back Kolby Smith —— a fifth-round pick who did not even start at Louisville — was a special young player. Many of us didn’t see it.”
He goes on to write that the last two drafts have been the best in years and credits Herm with that success. I don’t quibble with Posnanski on these points, it certainly does appear that Herm has a knack for picking out young talent and then developing that talent into playmaking ability on Sundays. He spent six years with the Kansas City Chiefs in the pro personnel department scouting talent. Of course we never really recruited any offensive juggernaut during that period, but that might not be Herm’s fault at all, and the defense was awfully good. That might not have been Herm either.
To editorialize, I think the apologists and the detractors should all shut up and see what direction this team will take. Herm has two more years on his contract and in that duration we should have a pretty good idea where this team is headed. I agree with Posnanski that the team is rebuilding, and if Herm is allowed to rebuild the Chiefs from scratch into the team he and his staff scouted and game planned around, then let him do it. Now I sound like a Herm apologist, but is there really any other way to know whether Herm can turn this team into a contender or not?
Another criticism of Herm that goes back to his New York days is that he has poor clock management skills. I will give the apologists’ rebuttal in the next entry on this topic.

Saturday, November 24, 2007

Border War

The Border War. MU vs. KU. Or Arrowhead Armageddon as Fox 4 News stupidly puts it. We here in Kansas City could never have predicted that this rivalry would have such high stakes as the game tonight does. The series is tied at 53-53-9 since the teams first faced each other in 1891. So not only will one team destroy their rival's ambitions of a national championship this season, they will also go one up in the alltime series after this historic tiebreaker game. A Wall Street Journal article and several local articles have invoked the bloddy history of the civil war skirmishes that took place just before and during the Civil War. Kansas was largely an anti-slavery territory, and Lawrence was the epicenter of the abolutionist ambitions of the state's residents. The Kansas-Nebraska Act laid the groundwork of the border war by declaring that the inhabitants of the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska would decide by vote whether the new states would allow slavery or not. Pro-slavery Missouri residents began pouring into Kansas and established pro-slavery outposts in Leavenworth and Atchison. Anti-slavery organizations from New England recruited heavily armed emigrants to settle Kansas and established free-state settlements in Topeka, Manhattan and Lawrence. The proslavery forces won, but abolitionists created a shadow government. John Brown then came to Kansas and skirmishes began. "Border ruffians", the name given to Missourians who illegally voted in the Kansas elections, would march on Kansas and burn the Free State Hotel while also ransacking businesses and homes. Brown retaliated by leading an attack on a proslavery settlement, which resulted in the hacking of five men to death with broadswords. By the time the border war ended in 1859, 59 people had been killed in the skirmishes and "mini-wars." Kansas would eventually enter the Union in 1861 as a Free State, but not after the damage had been done and resentment built up for the savage violence committed by both sides.
Flash forward to today, a St. Louis Post-Dispatch article sites a Misouri man "whose great, great grandfather had been murdered on his farm, apparently by a Kansan.
"And when he was telling me this story, he said, 'And we think we know who did it,' " said Rafiner, noting that the suspected descendants lived just miles away."
KU athletic director Lew Perkins claims that the Arrowhead crowd will be 70-30 percent in favor of KU, a claim that MU associate athletic director Mark Alnutt hotly disputes. The game is technically a "home game" for KU, which means it had a greater percentage of tickets to sell to its fans than Missouri, but the Chiefs also had 29,000 tickets to sell, and MU fans claim to have taken a large percentage of those. Many media outlets are claiming that KU fans outnumber MU fans 3-1 in the Kansas City area, where the border war takes on even greater significance given the intermixing that is forced to take place here.
The jokes fly back and forth between the two schools. One KU t-shirt witnessed recently declares, "My coach can eat your coach on and off the field." Another I picked up from that same St. Louis Post-Dispatch story has Mark Mangino lost in Kansas City, so he goes to a gas station to ask how to get to 435. The attendant responds, "skip a few meals."